Tidy Towns Competition 2006
Adjudication Report
Centre: Celbridge Ref: 338
County: Kildare Mark: 198
Category: G Date: 21/07/2006
|
Maximum
|
Mark Awarded
|
Overall Development Approach
|
50
|
27
|
The Built Environment
|
50
|
26
|
Landscaping
|
50
|
24
|
Wildlife and Natural Amenities
|
50
|
28
|
Litter Control
|
50
|
22
|
Waste Minimisation
|
20
|
4
|
Tidiness
|
30
|
13
|
Residential Areas
|
40
|
23
|
Roads. Streets and Back Areas
|
50
|
25
|
General Impression
|
10
|
6
|
TOTAL MARK
|
400
|
198
|
Overall Development Approach:
The adjudicator would like to
welcome Celbridge to the 2006 Tidy Towns Competition, and it is great to have
Celbridge back in the competition after an absence of three years. Thank you
for the comprehensive folder of
documentatin all of which was most useful on adjudication day, a fine sunny
July morning. You have been
receiving good media coverage and that is very important from a Tidy Towns
point of view. The Tidy Towns
Committee of twelve people appears to enjoy good community and business
support. Hopefully the 2001
village Renewal P!an will get back on track to allow
you to further your plans for Celbridge. The adjudicator
notes that a Tidy Towns Work Programme or Plan for Celbridge was not submitted
with the entry
documentation.To do well and make real progress in the competition it is
recommended that all towns and
villages have a simple straight forward 3 - 5 Year Tidy Towns
Plan for their area. This Plan is prepared by
your Committee in consultation with the appropriate local organisations. It
should be no more than seven to
ten pages long. The purpose of the Plan is to guide the work of your Tidy Towns
Committee and others for
Celbridge over the short to medium term. Your Plan should detail year by year
the work that you intend to do
each year. It is recommended that you do not have too many objectives each year
- perhaps 4/5 key projects.
The Built Environment:
The Famine Graveyard restoration
project is an excellent initiative and it is so important that this aspect of
our history is preserved for future generations. The drawings provided were
most helpful. Hopefully in time
you will be able to arrange signposting to the graveyard. Your initiative in
respect of the house at the
entrance to Castletown House is highly commended and this property when fully
restored will be an
interesting addition to the Irish Landmark Trust holiday accommodation
portfolio. The Church of Ireland
Church building provides an impressive introduction to the beautiful Castletown
House and estate that is so
well presented. The
feature here. The AIB premise with the grey painted brick is a little dated in
concept. Nearby the traditional
Gogarty shopfront dates from a time when Celbridge was probably a small
village. Have you considered with
the Local Authority the possibility of developing an incentive scheme for
shopfront improvement in the
Street
hanging baskets. Quite often just a small display can be more effective than a
very large display on the same
building. Celbridge despite problems of traffic still manages to retain an
attractive village feel and hopefully
this atmosphere will be preserved in the future.
Landscaping:
The planting of Spanish chestnut and London Plane trees in
Celbridge and the support of Intel for the
planting programme on the
the old Famine Graveyard on the Maynooth road will be a great resource for
wildlife in that area. Excellent
landscaping was noted at the entrance to
makes an important contribution to that part of this approach road to
Celbridge. Other good landscaping that
caught the eye included the entrance area to the St. John of God property which
was colourful and
appropriate in scale and impact. Quite a number of the housing estates have
made great efforts in respect of
landscaping and their continuing support for your work is so important. At the
Grotto the grass was in need of
cutting.
Wildlife and Natural Amenities:
You have
done good work on the restoration of the riverbank area near the Mill. The view
of the side of the
Mill from here is quite spectacular. The adjudicator noted the wildlife in the
river but it is a pity that there are
no wildlife informational panels at the pedestrian bridge area. It is important
that your Tidy Towns Committee
would examine further the wildlife potential of Celbridge, and see what you can
achieve in terms of making
your area even more wildlife friendly.
If you have not already done so, the starting point is to
have a habitat survey carried out of the wildlife in your
area. Suggested habitats to be considered include the following -
--- Urban habitats - gardens, waste ground, walls,
graveyards, hedges
--- Wetland habitats - rivers, ponds, reed marsh, bogs
--- Woodland habitats - forests, hedgerows,
plantations, parks
--- Grassland habitats - roadside verges, parks, wet
meadows, dry grasslands
The survey should produce a species list for each of the
habitats relevant to the Celbridge area. This need
not be an expensive survey. Perhaps there is a knowledgeable person locally who
might undertake this task
for you. Basically the survey would identify the animals, plants, birds, fish
that inhabit your area and their
associated habitats. It should be remembered that to carry out the survey
properly that it will probably take a
year so t-'ai ail habitats can be assessed at different time of the year.
Using the results of the wildlife survey
your next step should be do draft a straight forward Plan for Celbridge
to
preserve the identified habitats in the area, and investigate the possibility
of new ones.
It is most important to try and involve your local school
children in this project, and in many Schools there is
probably a teacher who may have an interest in this area who would be willing
to get involved. The future
boardwalk project sounds really interesting and we look forward to having
details of this in 2007
.
Litter Control:
Poor litter
control was noted on adjudication day both on approach roads and in the town
centre. In some
estates this was a problem also. Litter was noted in Beatty Grove estate,
Oldtown Mill, and especially on the
Shackleton approach road just before Tesco. Quite a lot of litter was noted on
the
the short road that leads to the pedestrian footbridge. Much litter was noted
around this bridge area also.
Despite the litter control programme that you have detailed in your entry
documentation litter control is a
difficult problem.
Waste Minimisation:
This is a new category in the Tidy
Towns Competition introduced in 2006. The purpose of this new category
is to encourage Tidy Towns Committees and the community that they support to
get involved in projects that
will reduce waste and encourage recycling. Marks can be gained by Celbridge for
the promotion of best
practice. This can include community guidance on methods of reducing waste,
segregating litter during clean
up events. You could also consider a partnership with local firms and
businesses to encourage them to
reduce unnecessary waste. Your involvement in Bottle Bank placement in
Celbridge is noted and it is
important that your views are taken into consideration in regard to such
matters.
Tidiness:
Graffiti was noted on the low wall on the Clane approacn near
the main road. Also on this road the area
opposite the sports ground with the timber post and rail -'encing was quite
untidy. Just beyond the Grotto on
the Timahoe road two untidy open spaces were noted one with a wire gateway. The
railings along the river to
the rear of the Bridge House premises would
be improved if painted matt black. This area has long grass and
weeds and graffiti and would be greatly improved if tidied up. The general area
of the pedestrian bridge
needs a lot of improvement in presentation terms. The river bank area opposite
the McEvoy premises also
needs to be tidied and the litter removed. In summary the river area at the
pedestrian bridge has great
potential to be really attractive but needs a lot of further work.
Residential Areas:
Quite a number of the Celbridge estates were visited. One
recurrent problem was weed growth at roadside
kerbing that looks quite untidy. Attractive grass areas were noted at Beatty
Grove where there is a good
mixture of tree species. Poorly presented grass areas were noted at Castletown
together with damaged
kerbing. At Vanessa Lawns damaged timber fencing on the left just inside the
entrance needs to be
replaced. Quite good landscaping was noted at Oldtown Mill though litter was
also present. On
attractive older houses were noted each with an entrance porch area. In a town
the size of Celbridge that
has so many housing estates it is not possible in one paragraph to sum up all
estates in the town in terms of
overall presentation. However the following recommendations are offered by the
adjudicator who suggests
that the Tidy Towns Committee bring the these points
to the attention of all estates in Celbridge.
--- Road boundary walls will probably need to be
painted twice each year especially on busy roads.
--- Gable end
walls though sometimes difficult to paint should be painted when the rest of
the house is being painted.
--- Timber fencing will require treatment at least
twice per year.
--- All estates should be encouraged to provide
entrance name signs and directional signage within the estate.
--- Green open space grass areas will
need to be cut frequently if a quality presentation is to be achieved.
Remember that grass
,will probably have to be cut back from the top of kerbing by hand. The
provision of a
Few well chosen trees can often transform
an open space.
--- Areas to the back of estates can sometimes become
dumping areas for cut grass and other materials.
--- Simple landscaping at individual houses can often
be very effective if the proper trees and shrubs are planted
--- By their nature estates can sometimes have litter
control problems and this must be addressed by each individual estate in the
town.
If you do not already run a Tidy estates Competition
involving the estates in your town then now might be the time to consider doing
so.
It is likely you will be able to find a local sponsor
or sponsors who would be prepared to fund the prize fund. The prizes should
ideally be
in the form of vouchers for estate maintenance equipment
or for landscaping.
Roads, Streets and Back Areas:
The concept of the Approach Road Manager (APR) is most
interesting and one that this adjudicator has not
come across before. It is usual in the Tidy Towns Competition that the
boundaries are the 50 KPH speed
limit signs. On the Maynooth approach in from the roundabout further work on
roadside verges is required.
The narrow verge on the left on the Ardclough approach to Celbridge also needs
attention as this verge was
rather rough. Likewise the Clane /
were poorly presented. The Lucan / Dublin approach has that beautiful estate
wall along the left hand side of
the road that makes this quite a pleasant approach to Celbridge The long
approach road to Castletown
House is most beautifully presented. In summary most approach roads need
further work in the year ahead.
General Impression:
Celbridge has an attractive Liffey side location and the
town still has a friendly village atmosphere. Good luck
with your 2007 Tidy Towns projects.
2006 Category G results
Ennis |
288 |
Letterkenny |
287 |
Kilkenny |
284 |
Malahide |
276 |
Carlow |
271 |
Clonmel |
268 |
|
255 |
Newbridge |
253 |
Ballincollig |
249 |
Portlaoise |
246 |
Naas |
243 |
Navan |
243 |
Leixlip |
227 |
Mullingar |
222 |
|
218 |
Ballymun |
214 |
Athlone |
214 |
|
212 |
Celbridge |
198 |
Celbridge Tidy Towns contact phone# 086-2200678
Volunteers always very welcome.